azulejo
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Aug 2006
Location:
Posts: 4
|
So in effect... the photo is computer fakery.
Is a photo put through Photoshop fake ?
I took a photo at a concert last month, and someone wanted to use it on his site (not a photographic site but one dedicated to the subject matter). I was asked for details about the photo. I relayed the EXIF data and explained the processing I had done in Photoshop. Photo on site & had some nice comments.
However, one comment reads " So in effect... the photo is computer fakery. Nice job anyway."
Now, if I'd put little stars & wispy clouds all over the picture....yes that would be fake However, that which I did in Photoshop to cut a long story short was : cropped it; removed some noise; adjusted the colour saturation & tone (by using an action, & then combining the result of that with the original image, using HDR). I'm certainly no expert, but I do like to experiment to see how I can optimise an image, but yet keep it true to what was conveyed emotionally when taken.
I suppose processing is something that can be argued about till doomsday and there will be no agreement. Sure I read a quote once from Ansel Adams saying something developing the image as being part of the creative process, and did he not foresee the World of digital ?
If I hadn't compensated for exposure in camera & had to correct this in processing, would that also be fakery ?
If one shoots film the result still depends on type of film; paper; and processing. To my mind getting the optimum tonality & colour in Photoshop is no different. It's just that have more control.
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|