pip22
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 48
|
It's generally accepted that the human eye cannot see individual dots or pixels in a photo at normal reading distance if there are at least 300 of them per inch. Therefore, to go above that figure would simply create a larger file with no visual benefit. So the figure of 300 pixels-per-inch for photo-quality printing became the norm. However, note I said "normal reading distance", and this is where you can get away with less than 300. If you are going to make a very large print (poster size) which is meant to be viewed from several feet away, your source image need only have 150-200 pixels-per-inch, because from several feet away we still would not be able to see the individual pixels in the printout. But for all 'normal' prints up to 8 x 10 inches, I never go below 300 ppi., and I save all my images as such.
Now for the RAW file format. many advanced cameras, and all digital SLRs, let you shoot and save as RAW. This produces larger files than a JPEG, but it's big advantage is that, using software, you can adjust every aspect of a RAW image just as though you had 'a second chance' at taking the shot with your camera. That's especially important if your camera sometimes gets the white balance wrong. Unless it's a RAW image, correcting the white balance afterwards is nigh impossible or at best extremely difficult. A RAW image is not processed inside the camera (the file just carries a record of your camera settings), whereas a jpeg file IS processed inside the camera, and a lot of that cannot be corrected easily if something was overdone or not set right on the camera at the time.
One last point about RAW. It's not compressed (that's why it creates a bigger file), but because it's not compressed that means no image colour data is being discarded. That's why (as well as the other reasons above) the pros and perfectionists use it. A jpeg, on the other hand, IS compressed. Colour-data is discarded to allow the compression to work. In many cases this damage can be seen on the photo if it's printed larger than snapshot size.
Last edited by pip22 on Feb 8th, 2006 at 08:42 PM
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|