|
 |
pip22
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 48
|
Archiving RAW files - Wise or not wise?
What's the consensus on archiving your images in RAW format? I've been told that shooting in RAW is fine (which I do), but archiving them as RAW is unwise because in years from now you may not be able to read them since it's not a standardised format - it's proprietary and varies according to the camera manufacturer (which is true). Much better, I'm told, to convert them to a universal format (low-compression jpeg or tiff)and archive these instead. I've already archived a couple of hundred ORF files (Olympus raw)
and now wonder wether that was a smart move. Anyone?
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 16th, 2006 02:55 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
rct4905
Founding Member Platinum Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Oct 2003
Location: Bucks County, PA
Posts: 2155
|
You should archive your RAW images.
If something you adjusted in the saved tiff file wasnt what you wanted, you would not have the raw file to go back to.
I have been archiveing the raw and tiff or jpg files all on the same DVD
Some people archive the raw on a DVD then any that they convert to tiff or jpg get archived on a separated DVD.
I think archiving both is your best bet
I dont think it would be in the best interest for camera makers to create raw files that will not be accessible in the future.
__________________
http://www.pbase.com/reflectionsbyruth
_______________________________________
Sometimes I do get to places just when God's ready to have somebody click the shutter. -Ansel Adams
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 16th, 2006 04:24 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
pip22
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Oct 2005
Location:
Posts: 48
|
Thanks for your input. So it seems archiving RAW is to be recommended (I agree with your reasoning - always having the original capture to work from in the future) accompanied by a converted version of each file. The 'belt and braces' approach makes sense to me!
Thanks again.
Pip
Last edited by pip22 on Jan 16th, 2006 at 04:59 PM
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 16th, 2006 04:50 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
plarson
Administrator Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Central, Florida
Posts: 1805
|
Ruth as always has provided great advise 
One additionally thing to consider is media lifespan
excerpt from cnet
"Unlike pressed original CDs, burned CDs have a relatively short life span of between two to five years, depending on the quality of the CD," Gerecke says. "There are a few things you can do to extend the life of a burned CD, like keeping the disc in a cool, dark space, but not a whole lot more."
Read Full Story .. > http://reviews.cnet.com/5208-7597_7...threadID=149723
__________________
Best Regards
Paul
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 16th, 2006 08:04 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
| The time now is 02:51 PM [GMT] |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|  |
Canon Cameras Nikon Cameras Olympus Cameras Sony Cameras Kodak Cameras Pentax Cameras
Minolta Konica
Fujifilm Finepix Cameras Panasonic Cameras Other digital cameras Forums
All comments, critiques and images are property of their posters. Company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Powered by vBulletin and vbPortal.
Copyright BytePhoto.com 2003-2008 - Digital camera reviews, digital photography news, digital camera forums and free online photo sharing album gallery.
Site Map

Monitor Calibration
|