|
 |
diginoob
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 25
|
Canon 350 D good for a second camera?
well i have a not so good sony DSC 73-z and i was thinking of buying miself canon 350 D. i love taking photos and i was wondering if this camera should be fine for me coz im a bit new with digital cameras but i learn fast and i love taking photo. so is this camera to good or is it ok for a 2nd camera?
ps: i want to move up slowly to the best cameras coz i dont want to buy a pro camera yet coz im new with digital cameras
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 11th, 2006 07:50 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
RVB Pix
Administrator Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jun 2003
Location: Scotland - France
Posts: 1781
|
Hi,
I personally think it's step in the right direction. It's a very good digital SLR camera.
__________________
Kind regards
Stephen
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 12th, 2006 10:51 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
diginoob
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 25
|
yeah i realy want to get a nice camera and i think canon is one of the best kind of cameras you can get if not the best
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 12th, 2006 04:20 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Hosebag
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 15
|
350D
I just got this camera and I love it. Get a good lens, like one of the "L" series, but they are expensive. There is no "live" LCD preview while you take the picture, you have to use the eyepiece viewfinder, then your picture appears on the LCD after you take the picture.
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 13th, 2006 01:17 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
diginoob
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 25
|
so i cant take photos by looking on my LCD screny? it only apears when you take the photo. im used to look at that Miny LCD screen when i take the photos:S
are all canon cameras like this?
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 13th, 2006 04:53 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
Rufford
Senior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jul 2005
Location:
Posts: 125
|
All canon digital SLRs require the shooter to look through a viewfinder. Since the image sensor is covered by a shutter, live preview via the LCD is not possible.
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 13th, 2006 05:03 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
koekeloer
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location: Netherlands, Haarlem
Posts: 3
|
Not only Canon SLR cameras require looking thru the viewfinder, this is for all (D)SLR camera's.
__________________
my pictures on : www.canon-pictures.com
Canon 350D Black
Sigma 18-50 1:3.5-5.6 DC
Canon EF 28-80 1:3.5-5.6
Canon EF 75-300 1:4-5.6
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Jan 16th, 2006 09:35 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
diginoob
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Jan 2006
Location:
Posts: 25
|
so basecly all the "good" cameras are SLR? what does this mean anyway? is there any camera that is good and can take photos tru LCD screen
ty
ps: sory coz i bumped up the old topic;)
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Feb 20th, 2006 05:04 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
SlipNslide
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Mar 2006
Location: Bay Area CA.
Posts: 89
|
SLR stands for Single Lens Reflex. In this kind of camera one lens is used for both focusing and taking this picture. A reflex camera usually means there are interchangeble lenses.
Last edited by SlipNslide on Mar 7th, 2006 at 09:23 PM
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
Mar 7th, 2006 09:20 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
digitalcam
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 11
|
Once upon a time long ago and far away, I had a 35mm SLR. Then came the point and shoot digitals. Great idea because you could see your results quickly. That improved my photography tremendously. Just couldn't get the quality I wanted with point and shoot. So I picked up the 350D. Big difference!! Even being rusty on SLR operations and using the cheapo kit lens, it is a quantum leap. Can't wait to get a decent macro and a good wide angle.
__________________
Digitalcam
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
May 4th, 2006 07:01 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
swier
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 76
|
"Good Lens"
Hosebag, or any Canon Shooter.
What is considered a "good lens" or "L" series. I am looking at he Nikon D200 but it may be much out of my price range. If I were to get the Canon is there a comparable lens to the Nikkor 18 - 200mm VR lens they have just released? VR is the Vibration Reduction feature from Nikkor probably compared to the IS of Canon.
Thanks for your help
Scott
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
May 15th, 2006 12:52 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
digitalcam
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 11
|
I picked up those lenses I wanted and am getting the results I expected. I chose the Canon EF 17-85 IS USM. All the good lenses are more costly but I believe the Canons are generally a bit less so on equal quality.
__________________
Digitalcam
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
May 15th, 2006 01:47 AM |
|
|
|  |
 |
brochures
Junior Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Apr 2006
Location:
Posts: 21
|
It does give you true wide angle coverage (equal to a 27mm lens on a full frame 35mm camera) and being an "L" series lens it's built to professional standards with high quality optics, a silent USM ring motor, distance scale and comes with a hood. usefull for landscape an portraits. For $480 at Amazon.com.
__________________
Brochures Printing
Last edited by brochures on May 16th, 2006 at 04:02 PM
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
May 16th, 2006 03:58 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
swier
Member Gallery: Latest Photos
Registered: Apr 2006
Location: Texas
Posts: 76
|
Sports Pics with this one
With this EF 17-85 IS would I be able to get decent shots of my kids in there sports activities? These photos would not be a huge zoom requirement because I am usually on the sidelines coaching and shooting. This distance that I would like to have would be about 35-40 feet away with a full frame, rotated potrait, head to toe. It just seems that the Nikkor has the reach out and touch you as well as the wides and portraits covered with their 18-200mm. Does Canon have a single lens comparable to this?
Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged
|
May 16th, 2006 08:07 PM |
|
|
|  |
 |
| The time now is 02:58 PM [GMT] |
 |
|
 |
|
|
|  |
Canon Cameras Nikon Cameras Olympus Cameras Sony Cameras Kodak Cameras Pentax Cameras
Minolta Konica
Fujifilm Finepix Cameras Panasonic Cameras Other digital cameras Forums
All comments, critiques and images are property of their posters. Company and product names may be trademarks of their respective owners. Powered by vBulletin and vbPortal.
Copyright BytePhoto.com 2003-2008 - Digital camera reviews, digital photography news, digital camera forums and free online photo sharing album gallery.
Site Map

Monitor Calibration
|