Digital camera & digital photography resources
for professional & amateur photographers

Aperture Size and Sharpness

Hey guys,

I am currently reading "The Complete Idiot's Guide to Photography Like a Pro."

While discussing "landscape mode" the author says that the camera sets a small aperture for great sharpness from foreground to background. For "portrait mode" it is the opposite.

Moreover, the author writes " in aperture priority, you set the lens aperture you want (a small one to get everything sharp from foreground to background, or a large one to throw the foreground and background out of focus)..."

Can someone please explain this relationship? ie) I do not understand how the aperture size affects image sharpness and contrast. If I have a small aperture and a slow shutter speed, will not the exposure and sharpness be the same if I use a large aperture size and a fast shutter speed?

Thanks in advance,

Chris.

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

Chris, this could be a very technically driven answer but I will deliberately keep as simple as possible. Th aperture selection detrmines the depth of field ie the distance in front of and behind the point of focus(subject) that will be rendered sharp.As you stop the the lens down, the depth of field increases, open it up and it is reduced.
To answer your second point, yes exposure will be the same but depth of field will not and this is what can give the appearance of loss or increase in contrast. but it will not alter the sharpness of the the subject you have focussed on. Also, in landscape photography time of day can determine contrast and UV content can also determine this.
Hop this helps.

__________________
beejay

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

On your camera, Aperture is controlled with "F-stops." Aperture works like an eye's iris. Basically, it's the hole that lets light into the camera. Have you ever tried to see something far away? What do you do with your eyes? You squint, and what you're doing is actually bending the "lens" in your eye so it has a smaller aperture.

The relationship to aperture on your camera is, as I mentioned, f-stops. The thing to remember is the larger the f-stop setting, the smaller the aperture is. This causes the depth of field to be very large, so everything is in focus. The flipside to having such a small hole, however, is that barely any light is getting into the camera.

Think of the relationship between light and aperture size as water coming out of a faucet. When the “hole” is largest, water floods out. When the hole is small, water barely trickles out. To compensate for this, you have to either set a longer shutter or change the ISO value.

I can't really give you the scientific reasons of why light acts this way. I hope this helps you out.

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

Wait Im confussed. I know that the smaller number yields a bigger aperture opening, but I thought THAT what makes everything in focus.
is my experiment wrong?
http://www.bytephoto.com/photopost/data/500/4819apadj.jpg?5013

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

not quite sure what you mean there but hopefully this will answer your question:
Small F stop eg F2.8 will give larger aperture which will reduce depth of field which is area of sharpness in front of and behind point of focus.
Large F stop eg F16 will give smaller aperture which will increase depth of field again the area of sharpness in front of and behind point of focus.
beejay

__________________
beejay

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by wrxsavvy
Wait Im confussed. I know that the smaller number yields a bigger aperture opening, but I thought THAT what makes everything in focus.
is my experiment wrong?
http://www.bytephoto.com/photopost/data/500/4819apadj.jpg?5013

---

__________________
I'm not resourceful enough to insert a witty quip or intelligent quote here.

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

Holly crap! I had it right and someone posted

quote:

---

I would have said that the f2.9 setting was the bottom photo.

---

so I swapped the numbers around.

When its a blurred backgound that considered a "greater dof"?

Thanks for clearing up my foggy vision

I think my brain's Aperture f/stop was to low thats why its all foggy to me

Last edited by wrxsavvy on Mar 30th, 2005 at 06:25 AM

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

You you know what I just noticed, he wrote 2.9 I wrote 29

hmmmmmmmm

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

quote:

---

Originally posted by wrxsavvy
When its a blurred backgound that considered a "greater dof"?

---

__________________
I'm not resourceful enough to insert a witty quip or intelligent quote here.

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged

ahh thanks Mike

Report this to a moderator | IP: Logged