+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 6 of 6
Photographers Lounge Thread, First photo from my new lense in BytePhoto Community; This is the first photo i've taken with my new Canon 75-300 USM MK3 lense. Please click the link and ...
-
Mar 15th, 2007 05:24 AM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 3
First photo from my new lense
This is the first photo i've taken with my new Canon 75-300 USM MK3 lense. Please click the link and tell me what you think. www.bytephoto.com/photopost/showphoto.php?photo=78027
Sorry it won't let me do clickable links till 've posted a bit more, doh
Thanks
Trigger
-
Apr 4th, 2007 11:23 AM #2
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Feb 2007
- Location
- Phoenix, AZ
- Posts
- 7
Boy that lens help pay for itself in that image, didn't it? Great close-up, Trigger.
-
Apr 27th, 2007 10:59 AM #3
Nice capture although it seems it is little bit flat.
May I ask you how much you paid for that lens?I was born and brought up in Iran, a beautiful country full of history.
http://www.pbase.com/kombizz
-
May 10th, 2007 12:01 AM #4
Junior Member
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- Canada
- Posts
- 10
Very nice. Was it a crop?
Ah, the infamous EF 75-300mm 1:4-5.6 III USM.
Not the best lens out there, and I have one too, because it's so darn cheap.
I actually think it's somewhat under-rated. Of course, it's got some limitations, but if you stay within the boundaries, the photos are more than acceptable.
The reason why I bought it is that I want to shoot birds and other wildlife, but can't afford an L lens. Here's what I found through the use of this lens:
1: you will very likely need a tripod when shooting at 300mm, unless in very bright sunlight.
2: it fares a lot better against a darker green background, as opposed to say a bright blue sky. I've taken quite a few photos of birds in trees against a blue sky background; the chromatic aberration is quite significant. However, if the bird is against a green background like grass for example, the shot remains quite clear.
3: It is difficult to shoot something with high contrast without noticeable CA, unless stopped down - which is not too bad if the subject is not moving, and the background/foreground isn't too distracting.
4: Can't complain. You get what you pay for. Explore the lens a bit and deal with it, and let the magic happen.
Have fun with your new toy. I can assure you it will be a fun one.
-
May 24th, 2007 04:12 PM #5
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- Tring, Herts, UK
- Posts
- 4
Cool shot.
-
May 24th, 2007 05:37 PM #6
I own the 70-300 IS and also a 100-400 IS L. Like you, I have found the less expensive lense takes great photos - not that different than my expensive glass, and also a lot lighter to lug around. Looks like you have a nice sharp copy.
BuddyBuddy
Visit my Africa blog at www.ChobeSafari.com
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Canon lense
By gordon in forum CanonReplies: 3Last Post: Aug 29th, 2006, 07:36 PM -
Can sun harm your lense?
By diginoob in forum Photographers LoungeReplies: 5Last Post: Feb 18th, 2006, 06:04 AM -
10D and lense and decision and where :P
By claw in forum CanonReplies: 4Last Post: Mar 26th, 2005, 03:21 PM -
New lense
By GENESXXX in forum CanonReplies: 0Last Post: Jun 4th, 2004, 12:10 AM -
Lense options for 602 ?
By Boneyard in forum Fuji FinePixReplies: 1Last Post: Jan 24th, 2004, 11:43 AM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote











Bookmarks