+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 9 of 9
Photographers Lounge Thread, Why dont Digital SLRs have MPEG? in BytePhoto Community; Hi All
I am wanting to buy a Digital SLR but have noticed that none of them have MPEG. Is ...
-
Mar 29th, 2005 10:22 AM #1
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- South Africa
- Posts
- 3
Why dont Digital SLRs have MPEG?
Hi All
I am wanting to buy a Digital SLR but have noticed that none of them have MPEG. Is this true and why?
I know that the obvious response is that if you want to video buy a video camera. But its such a simple technology that I found a very useful feature of my point and shoot digital.
In adition to this none of them seem to have underwater casings for underwater photography.
If anyone can give me any logical explacations I would really be greatful.
Thanks and best regards,
Brendon____________
bwebmaster
-
Mar 29th, 2005 02:24 PM #2
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Rockingham, NC
- Posts
- 35
It's in the way they are designed
Most DSLR's use CMOS type sensors which cannot control the exposure electronically like a CCD can. Digicams use CCD sensors which don't require a physical shutter to open and close to set the exposure. They are always exposed to the light through the lens, so they are capable of taking video. The CMOS sensors in the DSLRs require a shutter to physically open and close at whatever exposure setting you have set. This shutter and the mirror that covers it so you can view the image in the viewfinder are blocking the sensor. This is also the reason that there is no live view on the LCD screen.
MikeI'm not resourceful enough to insert a witty quip or intelligent quote here.
-
Mar 30th, 2005 12:25 AM #3
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- South Africa
- Posts
- 3
Thanks Mike. That makes a lot of sense, so if I look for a DSLR that has a CCD sensor then it has a chance of offering video functionality.
This is a pity because I was wanting to buy a Canon, but I've read that all Canon DSLR's use a CMOS sensor.
Thanks for the informative reply...____________
bwebmaster
-
Mar 30th, 2005 03:49 PM #4
Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- Rockingham, NC
- Posts
- 35
I don't think any true DSLR offers video capability because you still have the mirror that covers the sensor so you can view the image in the viewfinder. This is also the reason there is no live view on the LCD. To manufacture a CCD sensor the size of the sensor in a DSLR would cost too much. Digicams can use CCDs because their sensors are about the size of a pinky fingernail or less.Originally posted by bwebmaster
Thanks Mike. That makes a lot of sense, so if I look for a DSLR that has a CCD sensor then it has a chance of offering video functionality.
This is a pity because I was wanting to buy a Canon, but I've read that all Canon DSLR's use a CMOS sensor.
Thanks for the informative reply...
MikeI'm not resourceful enough to insert a witty quip or intelligent quote here.
-
Mar 31st, 2005 12:59 AM #5
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2005
- Location
- South Africa
- Posts
- 3
Thanks again.
Suppose this means that I need to fork out twice the cash to buy a digital SLR and a digital camcorder....____________
bwebmaster
-
Nov 23rd, 2005 05:49 AM #6
Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2005
- Posts
- 48
Irrespective of whether a DSLR uses a CMOS or CCD sensor, it's the actual shutter and mirror that prevents the recording of movie clips. DSLR cameras still use traditional focal-plane shutters (as well as a traditional SLR mirror) which makes movie capture impossible. The mirror would have to swing out of the way of the sensor for the length of time you were recording which means there would be nothing to see in the viewfinder --- not good! Even on non-reflex digitals, the movie mode is a gimmick (I never use it on my Sony V3 and I didn't buy it for that). It's something which most serious DSLR owners are not interested in anyway. It's similar to the 'still picture' capture mode on a digital movie camera -- trying to be all things to all people. here again, it's a low quality gimmick which can never match the quality of the proper tool. Convergence of technologies and multi-function devices are with us because it's possible, but you have to be aware of the compromises.
Last edited by pip22; Nov 23rd, 2005 at 05:58 AM.
-
Nov 26th, 2005 01:12 AM #7clayton89 Guest
You won't have a porblem finding an underwater housing for any DSLR, but you need to realise that they're after market and therefor not able to offer any type of warranty. Secondly they are by no means cheap. Some are almost as expensive as the camera itself.
Happy hunting.
-
Nov 26th, 2005 09:49 AM #8
Best of the Best Winner 2005
- Join Date
- Aug 2003
- Location
- BC Canada
- Posts
- 270
Not sure about other models but I no the Olympus E300 has an underwater case available for it. Not sure about the price of the case but the camera itself is extremely good value for money especialy if you go for the two lense kit option.
This link should give you a little information
http://www.letsgodigital.org/en/news...tory_4085.html
As others have said also the E300 does not give you any mpeg capability.
Matt
-
Nov 27th, 2005 10:16 PM #9
Camera Housings
You can find underwater camera housings for most cameras, slr, dslr and of course point and shoot.
They are aftermarket, and as Matt said expensive. They typically cost at least what the camera cost.
I bought one several years ago for a sony cybershot and paid somewhere around $300 for it if I remember correctly.
An underwater housing for the Nikon D2X is $4900.00 for the inexpensive model.....
So - figure on paying about what you pay for the camera.
You can find some models by simply doing a google search with your camera model, and the words underwater housing in the search.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
FS: sony cybershot 3.3 w/mpeg
By camerapro in forum Classified AdsReplies: 1Last Post: Apr 15th, 2005, 03:25 PM




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks



Reply With Quote


Bookmarks